|
|
3.5.7. Subsequent Developments in Methane Hydrate Research
In 1992, the 10-year, eight million dollar program was terminated as government policy
shifted from long-term, high-risk R&D to near-term exploration and production R&D.
Although DOE funding ceased, work continued at USGS, NRL, NSF, ODP, universities,
other laboratories, and overseas.
The 1995 studies of the Blake Ridge, as part of the ODP
Leg 164, contributed significantly to the understanding of hydrates.
In 1991 and 1994, DOE sponsored the International Conference on Methane Hydrate
R&D so hydrate researchers from all over the world could share results and problems.
DOE’s Natural Gas Supply Program provided a small amount of funding in Fiscal Year
(FY) 1997 and FY 1998 to support activities in anticipation of the initiation of a new
program of methane hydrate research in FY 1999.
These activities included: (1)
participation in the production testing and sample analysis of a 1,200-meter deep well in
the Mackenzie Delta, Canada, drilled by Japan National Oil Company (JNOC); (2)
processing and evaluating seismic data in hydrates regions of the Gulf of Mexico; (3)
design of a global database of gas hydrates and related gas deposits; and (4) participation
in an industry/university gas hydrates consortium.
The startling success of international drilling programs targeting methane hydrates in
Canada and Japan indicated that the commercial exploitation of methane hydrates might
be possible sooner than previously thought. DOE began planning for a renewed, multiagency,
national, gas hydrates program.
A National Methane Hydrates Program was
developed through the cooperative efforts of a multi-agency task force that included
representatives of agencies and government entities, and academic institutions, many of
which had been actively involved in the work carried out between 1982 and 1993.
The
goals for this second phase of research, identified in two workshops in 1998, focused on
four areas:
1. Resource characterization,
2. Drilling safety and sea floor stability,
3. Global climate change, and
4. Methane production from hydrates.
A report by the task force titled “A Strategy for Methane Hydrates Research and
Development” published in August of 1998 laid out a new plan for meeting these goals.
Recognizing the need for coordinated effort, Congress and the President of the United
States enacted Public Law 106-193, the Methane Hydrate Research and Development Act
of 2000, in May of that year.
The bill called for the Secretary of Energy to begin a new
methane hydrate R&D program in consultation with the U.S. Departments of Commerce
(DOC)—represented by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Defense (DoD)—represented by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL),
the Department of the Interior (DOI)—represented by the Minerals Management Service
(MMS) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and now also the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).
The legislation directed these organizations to collaborate on a program to make
agreements with universities and companies through a competitive process to:
- Conduct basic and applied research to identify, explore, assess, and develop methane
hydrates as a source of energy;
- Develop technologies for efficient and environmentally sound development of
methane hydrate resources;
- Promote education and training in methane-hydrate science;
- Conduct basic and applied R&D to assess and mitigate the environmental impacts of
hydrate degassing (both natural and that associated with development);
- Develop technologies to reduce the risks of drilling through methane hydrates, and
- Conduct exploratory drilling in support of the above activities.
On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which
provided an amendment to the Methane Hydrate Research and Development Act of 2000
and extended funding for methane hydrate R&D through 2010.
The wording of the
Energy Policy Act called on the Secretary of Energy to continue to carry out the activities
directed by the National Methane Hydrate R&D Act (listed above), and in addition
specifically directs that the Program:
- Identify methane hydrate resources through remote sensing;
- Acquire and reprocess seismic data suitable for characterizing methane hydrate
accumulations;
- Offer fellowships or other means for graduate education and training; and
- Conduct production testing operations on permafrost and non-permafrost gas
hydrates, including drilling of one or more full-scale production test wells.
The Secretary of Energy was directed to report annually to Congress on the results of
actions taken to carry out this Act, and as with the previous legislation, the National
Research Council (NRC) was tasked with preparing a report on the progress made by the
program and submitting recommendations for future methane hydrate R&D needs for the
Secretary of Energy to deliver to Congress before September 30, 2009.
The work performed by the researchers involved in the 1982-1992 program provided a
strong foundation for these new initiatives.
Indeed, many of the institutions and several
of the individuals involved in the current program were also involved in the earlier effort.
- Please bookmark this page (add it to your favorites).
Copyright © 1995-2010 ITA all rights reserved.
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Page
Executive Summary
1. Background
2. GRI Research into Unconventional Gas Resources
3. Structure of the Enhanced Gas Recovery Program (EGR)
3.1. Eastern Gas Shales Program (1976-1992)
3.1.1. Key Questions and Related R&D Goals
3.1.2. Program Design and Overview of Major Projects
3.1.3. Key Eastern Gas Shales Projects
3.1.4. Highlights of Important Results
3.1.5. Subsequent Developments in DOE and Other Research Related to Eastern Gas Shales
3.2. Western Gas Sands Program (1978-1992)
3.2.1. Key Questions and Related R&D Goals
3.2.2. Program Design and Overview of Major Projects
3.2.3. Key Western Gas Sands Projects
3.2.4. Highlights of Important Results
3.2.5. Subsequent Developments in DOE Research Related to Tight Gas Sands
3.3. Methane Recovery from Coalbeds Program (1978-1982)
3.3.1. Key Questions Related to Coal Seam Methane
3.3.2. MRCP Program Design and Overview
3.3.3. Key Methane Recovery from Coalbeds Projects
3.3.4. Highlights of Important Results
3.3.5. Subsequent Research Related to Methane Recovery from Coalbeds
3.4. Deep Source Gas Project (1982-1992)
3.4.1. Key Deep Source Gas Projects
3.4.2. Highlights of Important Results
3.5. Methane Hydrates Program (1982-1992)
3.5.1. Methane Hydrates Workshop (March 1982)
3.5.2. Key Questions and Related R&D Goals
3.5.3. Program Design
3.5.4. Major Contracted Gas Hydrates Projects
3.5.5. Methane Hydrate Research Efforts of METC's In-House Organization
3.5.6. Highlights of Important Results
3.5.7. Subsequent Developments in Methane Hydrate Research
3.6. Secondary Gas Recovery (1987-1995)
3.6.1. Key Objectives and Program Design
3.6.2. Major Projects
3.6.3. Major Results
4. Elements of Spreadsheet Bibliographies (by Program)
Appendix A: Details of Major 1970-1980 Unconventional Gas Resource Assessments
. . . Feedback
| |